Abuse Institutional Abuse Essay Example for Free

Abuse Institutional Abuse Essay Unit 204 – Principles of safeguarding and protection in health and social care The numbers in the bracket after each question relate to the assessment criteria in the standards UNIT 4222-205 1. Define the following types of abuse: (1.1.1) see more:reports into serious failures to protect individuals from abuse †¢ Sexual abuse Sexual abuse is the forcing of undesired sexual behaviour by one person upon another †¢ Emotional/psychological abuse Emotional/psychological abuse may involve threats or actions to cause mental or physical harm; humiliation; voilation †¢ Financial abuse Financial abuse is the illegal or unauthorised use of a person’s money, property, pension book or other valuables. †¢ Institutional abuse Institutional abuse involves failure of an organisation to provide appropriate and professional individual services to vulnerable people. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour that amount to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness, stereotyping and rigid systems. †¢ Self neglect Self-neglect is a behavioural condition in which an individual neglects to attend to their basic needs, such as personal hygiene, feeding, clothing, or medical conditions they might have. †¢ Neglect by others Neglect is a passive form of abuse in which the wrongdoer is responsible to provide care, for someone, who is unable to care for oneself, but fails to provide adequate care to meet their needs. Neglect may include failing to provide sufficient supervision, nourishment, medical care or other needs. 2. Identify the signs and/or symptoms associated with each type of abuse (1.1.2) 3. Describe factors that may contribute to an individual being more vulnerable to abuse (1.1.3) 4. Explain the actions to take if there are suspicions that an individual is being abused (2.2.1) 5. Explain the actions to take if an individual alleges that they are being abused (2.2.2) 6. Identify ways to ensure that evidence of abuse is preserved (2.2.3) 7. Identify national policies and local systems that relate to safeguarding and protection from abuse (3.3.1) 8. Explain the roles of different agencies in safeguarding and protecting individuals from abuse (3.3.2) 9. Identify reports into serious failures to protect individuals from abuse (3.3.3) 10. Identify sources of information and advice about own role in safeguarding and protecting individuals from abuse (3.3.4) 11. Explain how the likelihood of abuse may be reduced by: (4.4.1) a. person-centred values b. active participation c. promoting choice and rights 12. Explain the importance of an accessible complaints procedure for reducing the likelihood of abuse (4.4.2) 13. Describe unsafe practices that may affect the wellbeing of individuals (5.5.1) 14. Explain the actions to take if unsafe practices have been identified (5.5.2) 15. Describe the action to take if suspected abuse or unsafe practices have been reported but nothing has been done in response (5.5.3)

The Character Elbow in Shakespeares Play, Measure for Measure Essay

The Character Elbow in Shakespeare's Play, Measure for Measure In Act 2, scene 1 of the play Measure for Measure the character Elbow, a representation of the "Comedic Constable" often depicted in William Shakespeare's comedies and traji-comedies, gives the director an unusual creative license in portraying this figure to give the audience a rich theatrical experience. (Evans 427) These characters are most commonly depicted as "artless, inadequate, naà ¯ve, and prosaic men who bumble through their official duties, sublimely unaware of their blunders, intent upon fulfilling their offices even when they are not really sure just what those offices are." (Evans 427) They are honest men as well, duteous, as "none of Shakespeare's comic policemen reveals any conscious neglect of duty." (Evans 430) In one high school production of the play Measure for Measure which I saw a while ago, the character Elbow was played as sort of a village idiot, using a slack-jawed southern accent. The actor almost appeared to be attempting to portray Elbow as a drunkard as well, which I later found through research was not the stereotype that Shakespeare was trying to mock at the time. I enjoyed the comedic representation of the character, but I now think that he could have been more effectively portrayed like the character Dogberry was in Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing, especially the most recent performance at Loyola's McManus Theater by Uzay Tumer. This performance can rather illustrate the character more as a man self-confident in his actions and duties who is plagued with an inability to communicate to the other characters. Elbow's speech and logic just becomes riddled with "self-contradictory malapropisms" which confuse those wish... ... probably the main reason I have drawn out this scene into a huge collaboration of expressions. Confusion, exasperation, confidence, perplexity, happiness, frustration, and sheer amazement are all of which I wanted to capture in this brief interaction. Works Cited Bennett, Josephine Waters. Measure for Measure as Royal Entertainment. New York: Columbia University Press, 1966: 31. Dawson, Anthony B. "Measure for Measure, New Historicism, and Theatrical Power." Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 3., 1988: 337 Evans, Hugh C. "Comic Constables--Fictional and Historical." Shakespeare Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 4., 1969: 427, 430 Ross, Lawrence J. On Measure for Measure. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1997: 52. Shakespeare, William. Measure for Measure. Ed. Barbara A. Mowat. Paul Werstine. New York: Washington Square Press, 1997: 43.

Politics in Nigeria Essay

Is there any lesson to be learnt in the war on terror where the proponents vowed never to dialogue or negotiate with terrorists, only to now realize, after the demise of thousands and loss of billions of dollars, that dialogue is the only option left for a lasting peace in Iraq and Afghanistan? Do we see such favour and sensationalism by the press on these botched attempts as we witness when the culprits happen to be Muslims? What would have happened if those Christians had succeeded in carrying out the blast? In a nation where the press in mainly in the hands of people of a particular faith, it is hard to be neutral in their reportage of these kinds of events; especially if it reinforces a stereotype and serves a hot selling item of news. John Akpava was caught with weapons at a Ministerial Press Briefing held at Radio House, Abuja. What would the press have done with this story if John Akpava were a Muslim? A ‘suicide’ bomber was allowed into the premises of the Church of Christ in Nigeria (COCIN), Jos, by a fellow member of the church, who detonated explosives that led to the death of 8 persons; 38 others were seriously injured. The Sun Newspaper of Tuesday, March 6th, 2012 reported that the said Boko Haram suicide bomber was identified by The Defence Headquarters (DHQ), as Mr. Adams Joseph Ashaba, ‘who allegedly masterminded the bombing of the Church of Christ in Nigeria (COCIN) in Jos, the Plateau State capital on February 26, disclosing, that he was actually a member of the Church.’ In another report on Daily Trust of Monday, February 27th, 2012, 8 members of the same (COCIN) were arrested this time in Bauchi with explosive devices desiring to set ablaze the church. Their arrest was almost thwarted by some Christians, but for the timely intervention of the Police. The above examples and that of the arrest of Augustine Effiong of Akwa Ibon origin who was reported by Thisday of May 21st, 2012, to have confessed his involvement in the BUK bombings, should make Muslim and Christian leaders realise that we are all in this together, and that we should work in harmony to bring about workable solution to the problem of insecurity in Nigeria. We have to do this. The problems of this country could only be solved by Nigerians. Yes, we can listen to good advice from abroad, and learn from other people’s experiences on similar matters. The ambivalence of the sacred is not to be seen as a bad thing. A polarised world is the one which should be strange. What we hold dear are not the same; our understanding of who God is and what His Laws are is also varied and diverse. The only thing we can firmly attest to as people is that we are brothers in humanity. The multiplicity of religions is a manifestation of our diverse backgrounds and reasoning. While some are content to worship the air and trees; others worship a fellow being as god. Look at Christianity and Islam for example: In either faith, we have hundreds of sects and variants. Each sect or variant in turn has its own idiosyncrasies and modes of worship and body of beliefs. The realisation that every time you are looking at the number 6 on a table, another sees the number 9 across that table helps to devise means to study and tolerate conflicting ideologies. While Muslims have been stereotypically dubbed as violent, Christians have had their share of stereotypes too. A typical uninformed Muslim thinks all Christians are Crusaders, trying to snuff out the light of Islam. He detests the Christians in his surroundings and distrusts them. When he meets the right Christian, he is confused and disorientated. He asks more and learns; he deepens his understanding and the shallowness of undue hate goes away. We also have stories of Christians referring to Muslims as idolaters and heathens who slaughter a ram every year to their god. One of such ignoramuses even wrote a book he titled â€Å"Who is This Allah?† He used that rare opportunity to show just how ignorant he is. The average uninformed Christian distrusts and despises the Muslims. The irresponsible journalism tactics employed by some media houses have also helped fuel the problem. The annual holidays connected to the Christian faith given by the Federal Government and most state governments are the Christian New Year, Good Friday, Easter Monday, Christmas and Boxing Day. We also have the weekly holidays of Saturday and Sunday to enable them go and worship. On the Muslim side we have the yearly holidays of Eidul Adha, Eidul Fitr and Mawlidun Nabiyy. The Osun state governor decided to give the Muslims their right by making 15th November, which corresponds to 1st Muharram a public holiday. Objectively, no one should have any issues with that; after all, are citizens are equal and what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander; but alas! That was not to be! The Christain owned Punch newspaper wrote an editorial condemning it and saying Nigeria is secular. How convenient! Muslims say he was sent by God as a messenger, bearer of glad tidings and warner against the impending doom of the end of time. They revere him and truly believe in him. They do not elevate him to a rank above prophethood. Any attack on his personality is an affront on their faith. The Muslims believe that Jesus (or ‘Eesa) the son of the Virgin Mary is alive, never died or resurrected, ascended to the heavens until his return, is a great prophet who was born in one of the four ways God perpetuates life. Any insult on him is an affront on the Muslim faith and any who disbelieves in him is not a Muslim. The Christians have two main beliefs about him. One says he is in fact God, Lord and Saviour; a part of a triune while the other contends that he was sent by God but lesser than God. These are clearly opposing views about the same people! Do we go out and persecute those who do not share the same sets of beliefs with us? Only a fool will answer in the affirmative! This madness must stop, and to stop it, we must know ourselves and what we hold dear better; that is no fool’s calling. We know and believe that if more of us know what you and I know today and if more are willing to practise our faiths to the letter, there will be little or no bloodshed. Over centuries Muslims and Christians and Jews have been murdered for the simple reason that they belong to a different faith; we can and must stop it.

Robert Motherwell Art History - 1099 Words

Andre Darville Professor Ming Art History 11 April 2016 Robert Motherwell Robert Motherwell was born in Washington in 1915, sought to be a conservative bank chairman as his father, Motherwell had other plans. Motherwell growing up showed more interest in intellectual and creative pursuits. Following the passion landed him with a scholarship to Otis Art Institute in Los Angeles, Ca. Infatuated with learning, he studied multiple different variations of education, such as philosophy, literature and art history. Thus leading him to Stanford and earning his BA in philosophy. Motherwell became friends with another philosopher named Alfred North Whitehead, this influenced his creative mind to pursue the possibilities of abstraction writing and†¦show more content†¦Motherwell through cognizant reflection lays the inception, and even the vital reason for foggy pictures in your brain all in all and of American Expressionism particularly, as he communicated in What (workmanship where individuals and normal items aren t obviously seen) intends to me, a (thing that is given/work that is done) to a symposium at the Museum of Modern Art, alongside the presentation Abstract Painting and Sculpture in America, in 1951: Everything that may dilute the experience is stripped away. The root of foggy pictures (in your psyche) in workmanship is that of any method of thought. (workmanship where individuals and normal articles aren t plainly seen) is a valid (attempting to know God) [_(...] or rather a progression of religious convictions that experienced childhood in the recorded circumstance/occasion that every religious conviction do, from a first (or most essential) feeling of inlet, an endless pit, a void between one s desolate self and the world. (workmanship where individuals and regular articles aren t unmistakably seen) is a push to close the nothingness that cutting edge men feel. Its foggy pictures (in your psyche) is its significance and core interest. Motherwell brought to light a philosophical challenge, it was the problem of perception and representation in the art. Motherwell learned in a seminar at Harvard